We’re delighted to welcome Prof. Sukanya Banerjee for the first of our 2020 Provincialism at Large events. Prof. Banerjee (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee), will be giving a masterclass and evening lecture as a joint event with Royal Holloway Centre for Victorian Studies.
Sukanya Banerjee is the author of Becoming Imperial Citizens: Indians in the Late-Victorian Empire (2010, awarded the NVSA Sonya Rudikoff Prize for best first book in Victorian Studies), and the co-editor of New Routes for Diaspora Studies (2012). Her articles have also appeared in journals such as Victorian Studies, Victorian Literature and Culture, and Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies.
The masterclass is entitled ‘”Nation”, “Home” and “Empire” in Victorian Studies’, and will be taking place on Thursday 13th February at 2-3pm in Room IN029 (International Building, Egham campus). The talk will be taking place on the same day at 6-7.30pm in the Moore Annexe Lecture Theatre (Egham campus).
Readings for the masterclass (pdfs below): Burton, A. (1997), Who Needs the Nation? Interrogating ‘British’ History. Journal of Historical Sociology, 10: 227-248. doi:10.1111/1467-6443.00039
Banerjee, Sukanya. “Transimperial.” Victorian Literature and Culture 46, no. 3-4 (2018): 925–28. doi:10.1017/S1060150318001195
Lecture 6pm:Colonial Economies, Consumer Loyalty, and the Transimperial
Can the expansive demands of the free market be reconciled with more sedimented yearnings for the “local,” the “provincial”? In revisiting this classic-and abiding question-this talk studies the relation between late-nineteenth-century India and Britain, considering how an idiom of consumer loyalty negotiates the tense relation between free trade and incipient notions of territoriality and nationalism.
During 2019-20 the project will be hosting a series of speakers exploring the idea of provincialism, regionalism, and scale across the nineteenth century. The seminars are a collaboration between Royal Holloway Centre for Victorian Studies and Centre for Geohumanities and explore the concepts underlying the project through interdisciplinary conversations, ‘at large’ across the circulating imperial networks of nineteenth-century provincial thinking. We are very grateful to the organisers of the long-running ‘Landscape Surgery’ programme in the Department of Geography for their support in programming this year.
Seminars Autumn Term 2019: 9/10/2019; 19/11/2019 in conjunction with Landscape Surgery
Josephine McDonagh (University of Chicago): ‘Provincialism, Multilingualism and the Novel: early nineteenth century migration to South America and Jane Eyre’
Wednesday 9th October 2019 2-4pm, 11 Bedford Square 1-03
Katrina Navickas (University of Hertfordshire): ‘Customary rights, property and contested belongings in English commons and village greens, 1795-1965’.
Tuesday 19th November 2019 2-4pm 11 Bedford Square 1.01
Abstract: This paper examines contested customary rights and landownership of commons and village greens in England in the 19th and 20th centuries. The 1965 Commons Registration act sought to map definitively the extent of common land and associated rights in England and Wales, but it was a flawed piece of legislation. Its implementation revealed the widespread difficulties of defining a common, its rights and its ownership, much of which has still not been resolved today. Some of those disputes stretched back into the 19th century and earlier. This paper takes as its focus the case studies of the 1795 court case about the village green of Steeple Bumpstead, Essex, and the contested ownership history of Wisley Common, Surrey, from the 19th century through to the 1965 legislation and the present day. It feeds into current academic and popular debates about land reform and legislation. What do such cases tell us about local and regional identities, and popular ideas of the commons and common rights? Why did people still claim common rights in 1965, and today?
Suggested further reading: Fitch vs Rawling, Fitch & Chatteris, 4 Feb. 1795, English Law Review, 126, p. 614-618
It’s not every day that a 200-year old dead woman sends you a message from the other side. It’s also not every day that you spend the afternoon parading around inside a thirteenth-century castle, or – perhaps most astounding of all – manage to capture and keep the attention of forty twelve-year old children for an entire day when talking about a writer they’ve never read. What more could you ask of a workshop day designed to get children to learn about, interact and engage with their local literary heritage?
The brief for the ‘Writing with George Eliot at Astley
Castle’ day was simple. Partnering with the Landmark Trust for one of their Heritage
Open Weekends at Astley Castle, we wanted, in a fun and simple
way, to educate local students about who George Eliot really was – a.k.a, the
local girl Mary Ann Evans from Astley, Nuneaton. We wanted them to be able to
picture her as a real person, who sat in the same rooms they were sitting in, and
who wrote best-selling novels about the exact places they were seeing with
their own eyes. We wanted her to prompt and inspire them to produce creative
works of their own. And given the outdoors nature of the day, ideally we wanted
all this to happen on a day when it wouldn’t rain – but then again, you can’t
always have everything.
So at 10am, on Monday 24th June, nearly forty KS2
students from Croft Junior School dutifully filed into the imposing country
church in the village of Astley, Warwickshire. While the students ogled the
lofty ceiling and family crests adorning the wall, they were ushered on a
whistle-stop romp through Astley’s history by Kasia Howard, Engagement Officer with
the Landmark Trust. Then P.I Ruth Livesey stepped in and introduced the woman
who was from then on to be the focus of the day, Mary Ann Evans.
Mary Ann, we all heard, was born in Nuneaton, just five
minutes up the road from Astley Castle. Her parents were married in this very
church, and her father worked on both this estate and the one next door in
nearby Arbury Hall. She would have roamed the grounds of the castle just like
children would do later that day; would have sat in the same pews as they were currently
sitting in inside the church, and she wrote in her novels about the exact views
and buildings the children could currently see. It became obvious, for example,
after reading about the church in Knebley from Scenes of Clerical Life (1858),
that the same church Eliot wrote about seemed suspiciously identical to the
very one they were sitting inside. Once in possession of this nugget of
knowledge, and armed with the extracts from the Scenes, the students were
then accordingly sent on a roaming search of the church building in a quest to
tick off all its identifying features. They would later learn that it wasn’t
just the buildings of Nuneaton that showed up in George Eliot’s work, but also
its inhabitants. One such inhabitant was described by Eliot as the most boring,
dull man there ever was, but recognized himself from Eliot’s description and
wrote letters to her in complaint!
These and other golden facts were digested in the next part
of the day, when the students had the opportunity to not just hear about Mary
Ann Evans, but to actually meet her. Cue Eleanor Charman, an actress from local
theatre group Sudden Impulse, who was willing to take a shot at adopting for
the day the persona of one of the most successful British female authors of all
time. Complete with bonnet, book, and strong opinions, Mary Ann greeted some of
the students from the village Reading Room, where she was able to further
elaborate on the local places – and faces – from her novels. After providing
some first-hand suggestions on what to do when getting those indignant letters
of complaint from those who recognize themselves in your novels, Mary Ann was
left to field questions from the students about her life and writing. Given
that she was 200 years old this year – and looking remarkably good for it – we
had paid her the homage of providing the students with blackboards and slate
pencils to write their questions down on, and the scratching squeak akin to
nails on a chalkboard proved an instant source of delight to the students.
Despite this, they entered into conversation with Mary Ann with surprising
earnestness. ‘Did you ever find your family and their views a little too
demanding?’ she was asked. ‘Did you ever miss them or regret your decision to
Meanwhile, back up at the castle, a raucous scavenger hunt was occurring in the gardens and grounds by a second group of students. Landmark Trust’s Kasia Howard had planted lines and phrases from George Eliot’s sonnets in strategic locations, and after the students had successfully hunted them all out, it was down to them to create a new, personalised remix version of their own.
A third group were upstairs in the castle itself, being led in a creative writing workshop by Anna Lawrence, Writer in Residence for the Provincialism AHRC project, and key figure in the project’s partnership with Writing West Midlands. While the group outside composed their poems and read them aloud, the group inside experimented with prose instead, producing as finished products postcards addressed to George Eliot. These contained descriptions about other local settings dear to them, just like Mary Ann had included in her own novels. When each of the three groups had finished, an immaculately planned changeover would occur and each of them would circulate on to the next activity station. Packed picnic lunches were a pleasant interruption to the grand order of the day, as was the discovery of a dead rabbit, a source of added delight (and horrified squeals) from certain of the students.
It truly was an enjoyable and educational day, and for me,
as a young early-career-researcher, it was encouraging to be reminded of how
much literature can matter. ‘Impact’ is a word thrown around constantly
in humanities academia, but this was the one of the first times I had witnessed
the effect that a project like ours could actually have on a real, living,
breathing community. Not only were these students learning about a historical
and literary figure at Astley, they were also learning lessons of identity. ‘Don’t
think that things aren’t important, just because they seem ordinary or
everyday,’ the spirit of Mary Ann Evans had been telling them. ‘Even the
ordinary and everyday can serve as inspiration to create.’ The feedback
we got from the teachers was similarly as edifying. Not only had they
themselves been inspired to read George Eliot and visit the other areas she
wrote about in her novels, they also all unanimously commented on the positive
effect they thought the day had had on the children. ‘They now have a sense of
pride in the area they are from, and feel a personal connection to such an
important historical figure from their local area,’ said one, and ‘Some of the
children really like to write, and George Eliot has been an inspiration to
them,’ said another. It was also universally said that they would all be
reusing the techniques and resources in their own teaching practice, the
exercises having been so successful that one of the helpers of the day
commented on the sense of ‘unbridled creativity’ that permeated the atmosphere.
It was a result that even Mary Ann Evans herself would have been proud of, and
nothing – even a timely shower of rain, just in time for lunch – could take
away from the success of it. Her views had originally prompted Mary Ann Evans
to leave Astley behind, but that day, her lessons and legacies had most
definitely received a homecoming at Astley. And hopefully, with the repetition
of these and other related activities, they will continue to live on, right in
the very place they began.
With big thanks again to the tireless work and preparation of Ruth Livesey, Kasia Howard and Anna Lawrence; the peerless acting of Eleanor Charman; the invaluable assistance of Colette Ramuz and Natalie Reeve, and the warm co-operation of the Landmark Trust, and all the year 6 pupils and staff from Croft Junior School!